« Syria, Iran and the Power Plays over Iraq | HomePage | Unacceptable »

10/26/2005

A critical time for Iraq































JohnKerry.com




Dear Friend,



Later today, I will deliver a major speech on the war in Iraq.



It
asks a hard and essential question: how do we bring our troops home
within a reasonable and responsible timeframe, while achieving what
needs to be achieved in Iraq?



One
thing is certain. It isn't by continuing to pursue the Bush
administration's "stay for as long as it takes" rhetoric. And it isn't
by blindly following their policy of cutting and running from the truth
that underlies that rhetoric.



That's
why my speech today will call on the Bush administration to immediately
draw up -- and present to Congress and the American people -- a
detailed plan with target dates for the transfer of military and police
responsibilities to Iraqis so the majority of our combat forces can be
withdrawn.



I hope you'll take a moment to read excerpts from this critically important call to action on Iraq.





http://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/speeches/spc_2005_10_26.html



My
speech today will assert that there is no reason Iraq cannot be
relatively stable, no reason the majority of our combat troops can't
soon be on their way home, and no reason we can't take on a new role in
Iraq, as an ally not an occupier, training Iraqis to defend themselves
by the end of 2006.



Today
of all days, it is important to note that instead of attacking
Ambassador Wilson's report, instead of attacking his wife to justify
attacking Iraq, the Bush administration should have simply paid
attention to what his report revealed.



As
I write this, we are waiting to learn whether the administration's
attacks will prove to be an indictable offense in a court of law. But
for its CIA leaks, and for misleading a nation into war, the Bush
administration will most certainly be indicted in the high court of
history.



Sadly, there have been a legion of Bush administration miscalculations that have left us having far too few options in Iraq.



It
is never easy to discuss what has gone wrong while our troops are in
constant danger. I know this dilemma first-hand. After serving in war,
I returned home to offer my own personal voice of dissent. I did so
because I believed strongly that we owed it to those risking their
lives to speak truth to power. We still do.



In
fact, while some say we can't ask tough questions because we are at
war, I say no -- in a time of war we must ask the hardest questions of
all. No matter what President Bush says, asking tough questions isn't
pessimism, it's patriotism. If you agree, I urge you to join me in
demanding a new course in Iraq. You can start by making sure as many
people as possible see this speech.





http://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/speeches/spc_2005_10_26.html



The
American people -- most importantly, the families of the brave men and
women serving in Iraq -- can no longer tolerate George W. Bush's
failure to spell out a reasonable and detailed plan of action on Iraq.
If the President refuses to act, we must call on Congress to take the
decision out of his hands.



I
urge you to read the speech I plan to deliver at Georgetown University
in a matter of hours -- and to forward it to as many people as
possible. Most of all, I hope you will resolve to join the entire johnkerry.com
community in the weeks ahead as we work to create an undeniable
groundswell of public pressure for a detailed, date-specific plan of
action on Iraq.




Sincerely,



John Kerry
















Paid for by Friends of John Kerry, Inc.











We apologize if you received this message in error.
Click here to unsubscribe
from our mailing list.



Friends of John Kerry, Inc., 511 C St. NE, Washington DC, 20002, U.S.A.





23:03 Permalink | Comments (3) | Email this

Comments

This from a man who has continuously voted in favor of this illegal war from the first vote on. This from a man whose solution to the Iraq quagmire during his presidential "campaign" was an increase in troop strength and an escalation of hostilities. This from a "National Security Democrat", all of whom are for increased troop strength in Iraq. This from a man who just voted for sanctions against Syria.
Don't believe this smoke and mirrors crap. Kerry is further to the right than Nixon and as much of a jack-booted thug as that treasonous goon in the White House.

Posted by: Brit Jones | 11/03/2005

John Kerry's initial vote on Iraq, and his sanctions votes on Syria, say good things about him. That he voted against the funding of the war -- that he "voted for it before [he] voted against it" --- shows that he is weak, but at least he gets it right most of the time.

Posted by: Dan tdaxp | 11/03/2005

"John Kerry's initial vote on Iraq, and his sanctions votes on Syria, say good things about him."

Voting to invade a sovereign nation unilaterally that posed no threat to the US says good things? Voting for sanctions on Syria in the continuance of a disasterous Middle East policy when there is no evidence of willful wrongdoing with regards to the US on Syria's part says good things? Senator's Kerry's votes have helped create one terrorist factory already. Helping to create another one is hardly something I would characterize as "getting it right". Bush Light is still Bush - instead of collaboration with these war criminals it would be nice to see some opposition.

Posted by: Brit Jones | 11/04/2005

Post a comment